Reviewers of Manuscripts, Volumes 37–38

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Reviewing Scientific Manuscripts: A Comprehensive Guide for Peer Reviewers.

86 The abstract provides the authors with an opportunity to summarize the objectives, methods, 87 results and conclusions for the journal readers. It is oftentimes the first, and perhaps only, section 88 of the manuscript that will be read as it is typically freely available through reference databases. 89 The abstract should provide a clear statement of the study objectives, which must match w...

متن کامل

Automatizing the Assignment of the Submitted Manuscripts to Reviewers: A Systematic Review of Research Texts

Purpose: To systematicly review the automatazation of the assignment of the submitted manuscripts to reviewers in order to identify the status of research studies in this field in terms of types of evidence of expertise, types of retrieval models used, and the research gaps, and finally some suggestions for has been offered for future research. Method: The current research followed the systema...

متن کامل

RFC 3738 WEBRC Building Block

This document specifies Wave and Equation Based Rate Control (WEBRC), which provides rate and congestion control for data delivery. WEBRC is specifically designed to support protocols using IP multicast. It provides multiple-rate, congestion-controlled delivery to receivers, i.e., different receivers joined to the same session may be receiving packets at different rates depending on the bandwid...

متن کامل

Developing and Evaluating Criteria to Help Reviewers of Biomedical Informatics Manuscripts: A Case Report

Peer-reviewed publication of scientific research results represents the most important means of their communication. The authors have annually reviewed a large heterogeneous set of papers in order to produce the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Yearbook of Medical Informatics. To support an objective and high-quality review process, the authors attempted to provide reviewers...

متن کامل

Case Report: Developing and Evaluating Criteria to Help Reviewers of Biomedical Informatics Manuscripts

Peer-reviewed publication of scientific research results represents the most important means of their communication. The authors have annually reviewed a large heterogeneous set of papers to produce the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Yearbook of Medical Informatics. To support an objective and high-quality review process, the authors attempted to provide reviewers with a s...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Aliso

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2327-2929', '0065-6275']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.20213801.05